Would a Charter of Human Rights promote disastrous religious vilification laws ala Victoria?

A very encouraging follow up to the Human Rights Consultation process is the address to be delivered today by the Consultations’ Chair, Frank Brennan.

One of the concerns I raised at the Hobart public consultation was whether a Charter of Rights would result in the introduction of religious vilification laws as in Victoria with its consequent curtailing of free speech and social divisiveness.

He (Frank Brennan) decided to speak out after people, including church leaders, turned up at consultations his team was conducting around the country to express concern “that a national charter of rights might entail a national religious vilification law similar to that in Victoria”.

“The application of the Victorian religious vilification law has hindered rather than helped religious and social harmony,” he said. “These laws cannot be administered with sufficient transparency and neutrality.”

I am very encouraged that the National Human Rights Consultation is listening and responding to the public consultations. And in this particular case, I am encouraged by the response in the Chair’s address.

See Cynthia Banham’s report ‘Rights charter will not lead to vilification law, Jesuit says’

Do we Aussies need a Charter of Human Rights?

As an uneasy fence-sitter on this one I eagerly registered for the evening opportunity to participate with about 75 other people at the community round table of the Human Rights Consultation.

What is the National Human Rights Consultation about?

It’s about seeking Australians’ views on human rights in Australia. The Committee reports to the Australian Government by 31 August 2009 on three key questions:

  1. Which human rights and responsibilities should be protected and promoted?
  2. Are these human rights currently sufficiently protected and promoted?
  3. How could Australia better protect and promote human rights?

At the community round table in Hobart we had the Committee Chair, Frank Brennan and Committee member Mary Kostakidis.

FatherFrankBrennanAOFather Frank Brennan AO is a committed advocate for human rights, having worked tirelessly for others for over 30 years.

MaryKostakidis

Mary Kostakidis is a well-known journalist and former television news presenter from Sydney.

The round table consultation was very helpful. I am glad I attended. A good suggestion from our table was the need for a clear statement of the way in which human rights are protected currently in Australia.

A major theme for me was the vital significance of the culture that forms and holds the protection and promotion of human rights. As a Christian I believe that while education is important to nurture humane conduct, it is not ultimately the solution because ignorance is not the ultimate explanation of our failure to treat each other humanely.

The key problem is that as we move away from our Judeo-Christian heritage so we will lose those basic commitments to human rights and responsibilities that stem from our understanding of life as God given and ourselves as stewards of that gift of life on this planet.

My chapter in, ‘Islam: human rights and public policy’ argues for dialogue around Australian values. Following this round table consultation I can see that a Charter of Human Rights may assist in clarifying some of those values. Also an Anglicare Tasmania submission in 2006 argues for a Charter of Rights in Tasmania.

At the Consultation I learnt that eminent Tasmanian, Rev Professor Michael Tait, has attracted comment with his submission re strengthening existing Senate mechanisms for scrutinizing legislation. I find this proposal attractive because it leaves power with the parliament and is simple and quick to implemented.

I attended the evening session of the round table having spent the day building a fence with a mate. I know a fence is not for sitting on. I still feel uncomfortable regarding a Charter. I guess I know where I am seated! My reservations are well expressed by the highly respected Professor Patrick Parkinson in his submission.

An ongoing conversation. For more information on the National Human Rights Consultation see https://www.humanrightsconsultation.gov.au

Restorative ways of healing and living healthy relationships: learning from St Michael’s Collegiate School

I was speaking recently with Collegiate School Chaplain, Scott Sargent, and he introduced me to the restorative processes the school is using to create a culture of healthy relationships. It is a non-punitive way to deal with poor behavior.

A very interesting presentation, ‘Relationships Matter’ by Michael Cross, Head of Senior School, is at http://publications.collegiate.tas.edu.au/pdfs/ancanthe_apr24_2009.pdf

In what ways could this enrich our wider Anglican Church life?

“Forty years! Doesn’t happen much today.” – Reflections on a 40th Wedding Anniversary

Close friends celebrated 40 years of married life on Sunday. We shared in a delightful extended lunch of reminiscing among true and trusted friends who had known the couple over decades. My wife and I were the ‘newest’ friends, having known them a mere two decades!

In the morning I had preached on the set Bible readings (the 4th Sunday of Easter, Year B, from the Lectionary). The biblical theme was not difficult to identify: The Divine Shepherd (Psalm 23), ‘I am the good shepherd’ (John 10:11-18), deeds done in the name of the Resurrected One (Acts 4:5-12) and the character of Christian love (1 John 3:16-24).

We know the identity of the Shepherd. He is the Good Shepherd, Jesus Christ. We know his presence in green pastures and in valleys of death. But to what goal is the Shepherd leading us?

The latter reading, John’s epistle, is an extended meditation on love, a prolonged outburst of praise to God, intertwining God’s self-giving love in Christ, our obedience to Christ’s call to love of God and neighbour, and to live our life ‘in Christ’.

And the connection between the Sunday sermon and the Wedding celebration? The connection is the character of Christian love. Christ’s way, the way of self-giving love is for every one of us, in all of life, in all of the 40 years of married life.

A passer-by commented upon hearing of the anniversary, “Forty years, doesn’t happen much today.” But it was happening, and in God’s grace we also by following the example of the One who laid down his life, obeying his commandments and abiding in Christ, will nurture life giving relationships of love.

And, thanks, Russell and Sue. May God bless you with many more years of life and love.

Paul’s ‘Mad Max’ chapter and Stephen’s leadership gem

The Director of Ministry led us on a ‘Mad Max’ apocalyptic scenario – “The world is collapsing, what chapter of the Bible would you take?” – the goodly Director claimed this question was to help focus our minds, on the Bible and our Faith!

Paul had chosen his ‘Mad Max’ scenario’s Bible chapter and he led us in a deep time of reflection and sharing through Luke 10: Jesus at the centre, mission in His heart, ‘peace to this house’, the challenges and choices of missionary discipleship, the cosmic consequences of our lives, the joy the Holy Spirit brings to Christ, the priority of love of God and neighbour, ‘am I willing to be neighbour, even to the unlovely?’, discipleship is both practical/praxis/servant/doing in acts of mercy and justice, and pietistic in taking time to be with Jesus. The Good Samaritan story and the Mary and Martha conversation with Jesus are in the same chapter of the Bible! – Piety and Practice belong together. And much more. Thanks to Paul and clergy.

A leadership gem from the Rector of Edge Anglican Claremont, learnt from his boss in a previous ‘non-clergy’ life re tackling tough tasks and the skills needed to accomplish them:

“The person who never made a mistake never did anything. The mark of a tradesman is not how many mistakes you make, but how you get yourself out of them.”

Inspiring thoughts from conversation in the Derwent Mission Network.

Breakfast With Tim In Tassie: ‘Post-Global Financial Crisis – Challenges of Christian Leadership in Uncertain Times’

This is the theme on May 14 in Hobart when Tim Costello, CEO of World Vision Australia, will address a Church Leaders’ Breakfast.

Tim has a prophetic role in the Australian church. The topic he will be addressing is highly apposite. Financial stringency engendered by the Global Financial Crisis can so easily skew our Christian understanding of the world, and there is in my view an urgent need to take a long, hard look at the calls for protectionism, the reversal of globalization and securing our borders.

Now, more so than in ‘good’ times, we need to be asking the hard questions about how our commitment to Christ plays out in our stance towards our fellow travellers on this tottering planet.

I will be a non-break-fasting breakfaster (or is that a fasting attendee?) due to some other matters on my agenda that day. I’ll be the bloke with the unused cutlery and a glass of water!

Breakfast Info http://www.anglicantas.org.au/index.php?item=file&target=breakfast

Bishop’s Prayer Retreat 2009 – ‘Walking in Holiness’

Each year I take time for a prayer retreat, drawing aside from the daily demands for prayer and reflection, to nurture my relationship with God and to seek wisdom in my life and ministry. It is a precious time.

This year I have decided to conduct the annual ‘Bishop’s Retreat’ myself . I have been developing the theme, ‘Walking in Holiness’, from the material and feedback from the talks I gave at the St Andrew’s Cathedral, Singapore, Family Camp in 2008.

The retreat program is taking shape and the talks to develop our prayer and reflection on the theme ‘Walking in Holiness’ will involve,

  1. God of Holiness – Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty
  2. The Call of the Holy – Be holy as I am Holy
  3. The Holy – Revealing, rescuing and calling
  4. The Spirit of Holiness – regenerating, transforming, glorifying
  5. The fruit of the Spirit – keeping in step with the Spirit
  6. Habits of Holiness – strengthening the holiness walk
  7. Walking in Holiness – growing in Christlikeness

It takes time to become holy. We need to take time to be holy.

Excuses you learn at staff devotions

The original fridge magnet quoted during staff devotions was,

‘It’s not my fault; I never learnt to take responsibility.’

The suggested staff (was it the Registrar?) amendment, adopted with acclamation, is,

‘It’s not my fault; I was never taught to take responsibility.’

And so to prayer!

On the 13th Anniversary of the Port Arthur massacre the quest continues to understand the life and motivations of murderer Martin Bryant.

A new book dealing with Martin Bryant, the murder of 35 people at the historic Port Arthur convict settlement in 1996, found significant coverage in this anniversary week of 28 April.

The horrendous tragedy profoundly affected those directly involved. In Tasmania the connections between people meant that many, many were affected. Any tragedy is a tragedy for all, and this is particularly true in an island community such as Tasmania.

There are myriad questions. But one in particular haunts us, ‘Why did Bryant do it?’

Under the title, ‘A dangerous mind: what turned Martin Bryant into a mass murderer?’, the Sydney Morning Herald published an edited extract from Born or Bred? Martin Bryant: The Making of a Mass Murderer, by Robert Wainwright and Paola Totaro (published by Fairfax Books, rrp $35). The extract is absorbing and provocative. It concludes with these words:

“Martin Bryant was not just a young man born with a personality disorder, intellectually impaired and struggling with autistic traits. His genetic load was the baggage he carried with him into life. What occurred around him, a devoted and vigilant father who effectively managed him – and an heiress mentor and eccentric friend – were equally important, creating a cushion around him that for a long period of his life protected him from reality. More importantly, they acted as constraints that impeded or at least diffused, and gave an outlet for, his most obsessive tendencies. Once Helen and his father were gone, Bryant was left to his mounting frustrations, his angers, his resentment of rejection and social misunderstanding.”

See the full edited extract.

A briefer extract considers the possibility that Martin Bryant was hoping that someone, somehow, would prevent his murderous act.

There are numerous other articles, including a moving story by Tim Martain in the ‘Sunday Tasmanian’, April 26, concerning the reunion of victims and featuring the bravery of local woman Brigid Cook and the gratitude of the family who her bravery saved from Martin Bryant’s murderous rampage.

Sadly, three days after ANZAC Day, we remember a tragedy at the hands of one of our own, and yet the darkness of that Port Arthur day could not extinguish the light of bravery and self-sacrifice.

I received the best Aussie affirmation on ANZAC Day!

It started as the worst nightmare, “Oh, no! The public address system isn’t working!”

I was at the podium to lead the Ceremony of Remembrance at the Cenotaph on the Domain in Hobart. Thousands of people had followed the marchers and now crowded the Cenotaph area. We had watched respectfully as wreaths were placed. I then stepped onto the podium to lead the Ceremony of Remembrance. To my horror the public address system failed to operate. Still, the combined choir from Collegiate and Hutchins Schools, with the Salvation Army Band, knew the drill and, being close enough to hear my unamplified voice, they led us in singing the opening hymn.

At this point I was ‘alert but not afraid’. The technicians would get the system sorted out during the singing of the hymn.

As the hymn concluded I spoke loudly into the microphones. The result? People in the crowd cupping their hands behind their ears signaling that I was mute. The PA system still was not working! I was now alert and afraid!

I commented, more or less to myself as the PA system was down (I later discovered the ABC broadcast all my comments as their microphone was working: be alert and very afraid!), that it was not possible to continue because we had the Governor of Tasmania’s Address and the Ode to follow. I therefore asked people to be seated for five minutes to give us time to fix the problem. There were enough people in the official party who could hear me and so they sat down. It was obvious that now we were alert and at work!

After a brief time the technician declared the microphones null and void, but he enabled us to proceed with the use of a hand held microphone.

The Ceremony lived out the true spirit of ANZAC: the crowd took the delay in their stride, the speakers joked as they passed ‘the baton’ (microphone) from one speaker to the next, we were blessed by the Governor’s excellent address, the Ode was profoundly moving, the prayers and singing fitting.

We had worked together to save the day, to take us somewhere beyond ourselves in a spirit of co-operation, of mateship: we lived the ANZAC spirit.

At a personal level, it was to get even better for me. A leading RSL official approached me following the conclusion of the Ceremony, shook my hand and looking me squarely in the eye said, “John, you did bloody well. You did bloody well. Thanks mate.”

It doesn’t get better than that!

My ANZAC Day involved a nightmare – but ended in a dream.