Abortion Update 24 May

From the office of Bishop John Harrower May 24, 2013

What is the current status of the proposed changes?

  • The Reproductive Health Bill (Access To Terminations) Bill 2013 passed the House of Assembly of the Tasmanian Parliament on April 16, 2013.  All members of the Greens party, and all members of the Labor Party, except The Hon. Michael Polley, voted for the Bill.
  • The Bill has NOT become law.  It must now be considered by the Legislative Council.  The Bill has passed the first reading in the Legislative Council. This simply means that the Council has agreed to consider it.
  • The Legislative Council will consider the Bill in detail in the coming weeks, probably sometime in June.  It may choose to reject the Bill, to pass the Bill as it currently stands, refer the Bill to a committee for proper consideration, or to change (amend) the Bill and return it to the House of Assembly.

What is actually being proposed, as it currently stands?

  • The Minister for Children (The Hon. Michelle O’Byrne) released a Draft Bill in March.  Our submission (see http://imaginarydiocese.org/bishopjohn/2013/04/05/abortion-tas-anglican-submission/ ) was based on this Draft Bill.  The Bill that passed the House of Assembly was slightly different to the draft but not in any substantial way.  The key concerns, as presented in our submission, remain.
  • The Bill, as it stands:
      • implements “abortion on request” for any reason, up to 16 weeks of pregnancy.
      • allows abortion at any stage in pregnancy after 16 weeks if a doctor and a specialist agree that proceeding with the pregnancy would be to the detriment of the mother.  The doctor must take into account a number of circumstances, including the social and economic impact on the woman.  These broad grounds effectively remove any restriction, even for late term pregnancies.
      • compels doctors who have a conscientious objection to facilitate in an abortion by referring any patient who is seeking “pregnancy advice” to a doctor who will provide the abortion.  This overrides a doctors professional judgement and duty of care.  It questions the professionalism of all those who ascribe human value to the unborn child.  Failure to refer runs the risk of deregistration and unemployment.
      • compels “counsellors” (broadly defined as any form of advice-giver) to similarly refer those seeking advice.  The penalty is approx $30,000 fine or imprisonment.
      • implements “access zones” that prohibits certain activities within 150m of an abortion provider.
      • has other technical issues that demonstrate that it has been sloppily and hastily drafted.
  • The stated aim of the Bill is to decriminalise abortion.  None of the issues outlined above need to arise in order achieve this aim.  If abortion is to be decriminalised, it should not be done like this.

What can I do?

  • We encourage you to make contact with the members of the Legislative Council in order to communicate your views on the matter.
  • The best form of communication is a letter, phone call or email that thoughtfully outlines the particular ways in which you disagree with the Bill.  You may wish to urge them to reject the Bill or to at least significantly amend it.   You may wish to tell them that the aim of decriminalisation should not be achieved through the measures currently included in the Bill.
    [A pdf 
    version of this post contains contact details for Legislative Councillors – click here]


Abortion Update 24 May — 1 Comment

  1. Dear Bishop John

    What do you think the [broader] church could do to help support women with unplanned pregnancies?

    As part of the church, what could parishioners like myself, do to assist the Anglican diocese to respond to women with unplanned pregnancies?

    Anyone keen to start a constructive conversation around this topic?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *