Anti-discrimination Submission

Recently I made a submission concerning human rights and anti-discrimination to the Attorney General’s Department of the Commonwealth of Australia’s discussion paper, Consolidation of Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws. Under “General Comments” I wrote:

Consolidating federal anti-discrimination legislation would be of benefit if and only if it can achieve increased efficiency and consistency, and thereby relieve unnecessary burden on organisations and the general public.

The cost of consolidation should also be weighed. The main potential cost is that of uncertainty. Anti-discrimination law must interact with the realities of society, with their attendant grey areas, competing valid assertions, and hard-to-define senses of value and reasonableness. Precedent has allowed the current legislation to become settled around these realities; a significant adjustment in the structure of the legislation is likely to require costly legal processes to clarify. The impact of this on the protections and freedoms of Australian society needs to be taken into account.

This submission is made as a response to a number of the discussion paper questions. The answers are informed by a position based on the following understanding:

1. Anti-discrimination law is a necessary component in the mechanisms of a decent, civil society. The Christian ethic includes a fundamental understanding of equality. The application of the gospel undoes inequality as the writings of Paul teach: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

2. Anti-discrimination law is necessarily an assertionindeed often a positive imposition, of values. Ideally the legislation should reflect widely-held and justifiable values in society in determining what attributes should be protected, and how they should be protected.

3. As the class of attribute described as “protected” is extended it becomes less simple and less uniformly absolute. This increases complexity, but it is a complexity that must be recognised and embraced if anti-discrimination law is not to be misapplied.

4. In particular, protections must be adequately balanced with freedoms otherwise the protections themselves can become unjustifiably discriminatory.

5. Certain freedoms must be clearly recognised and accommodated in the legislation. For instance, and in particular:

a) Freedom of speech.

b) Freedom of religion. Including the freedom to change religion, practice religion both individually and corporately, and espouse religious thought publicly.

c) Freedom of association.

You may read my full submission here.

Many other submissions on their website.

“The Global War on Christians…”

Below is an excerpt from an article in Newsweek Magazine February 13, 2012 by Ayaan Hirsi Ali:

We hear so often about Muslims as victims of abuse in the West and combatants in the Arab Spring’s fight against tyranny. But, in fact, a wholly different kind of war is underway—an unrecognized battle costing thousands of lives. Christians are being killed in the Islamic world because of their religion. It is a rising genocide that ought to provoke global alarm.

The portrayal of Muslims as victims or heroes is at best partially accurate. In recent years the violent oppression of Christian minorities has become the norm in Muslim-majority nations stretching from West Africa and the Middle East to South Asia and Oceania. In some countries it is governments and their agents that have burned churches and imprisoned parishioners. In others, rebel groups and vigilantes have taken matters into their own hands, murdering Christians and driving them from regions where their roots go back centuries.

Read the full article – Ayaan Hirsi Ali:The Global War on Christians in the Muslim World

A prayer for the persecuted and for the suffering church:

Our Father in heaven
Thank You that You are the Lord who provides and that You meet all our needs, in
ways that we often do not recognise.
We pray for all those who are suffering harassment, discrimination and persecution
for their faith in You, O Lord. We pray that You will give them daily strength to
endure their pain, whether it be physical, emotional or spiritual. Today, we think
particularly of those who have been left homeless because of persecution and
violence. We pray that they will remain steadfast in their faith and seek Your face
in their trials, and that You will meet them in their time of need.
Lord Jesus, help us to remember to give thanks for all that You have provided for
us and to remember our responsibility to provide for other members of Your family.
(Prayer taken from Barnabas Fund Suffering Church Sunday resources)

Also see What the Arab Spring Means for Christians, “Australian Parliament calls for an end to Coptic Persecution in Egypt

Sad facts: elder abuse in Australia

Excerpt below from an article from The Age (5 February 2011)

AUSTRALIAN nursing homes have reported nearly 4000 sexual and physical assaults against elderly residents over the past three years, raising serious questions about the safety of aged-care facilities.

Read the rest of the article: Assaults against elderly increase in nursing homes.  Paul Russell comments,

Director of The Elder Abuse Prevention Association, Lilian Jeter, estimated that there are a minimum of 100,000 cases in Australia each year with evidence of manipulation and control, intimidation and fear.

I ask a most reasonable question: What is likely to happen if euthanasia & assisted suicide is ever legally available in Australia in relation to Elder Abuse?

I have heard and read pro-euthanasia commentators dismiss these concerns.  Either they’re living in some Utopian dream-world or they simply have no answer to a growing and real problem that shines the light of reason on their dubious agenda.

If someone is manipulating an older person and controlling them to such a degree that they feel powerless to defend themselves and their property, then it is more than simply a theoretic observation to conclude that such contempt for that person could place their very lives in jeopardy.

Read more about the issue of elder abuse on Paul Russell’s (Director of HOPE: Preventing Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide) Elder Abuse – a reality we can not ignore

Hobbies of the Clergy #1

The Venerable John T., a noted cleric of our missionary diocese, is engaged in an innovative outreach project – wine making from the most varied of nature’s resources.

This particular hobby combines his love of birds (he and his family are keen “Twitchers”) and wine making. How? Well, this is the narrative as I understand it:

It’s amazing what wine can be made from: honey, flowers (dandelions, roses, jasmine), leaves (walnut, oak, elderberry), seeds (corn, rice, almonds, coffee), stems (rhubarb, grapevine), and roots (parsnips, ginger, beetroot, carrot)! But nothing too oily; e.g., coconut, peanuts, chocolate. Some of John’s wines have more than one basic ingredient: Beetroot and Pineapple, Clove and Ginger.

But how do you bring bird watching into wine making?

Well, each variety of wine is named after a Tasmanian bird. But this naming is not haphazard! The name of the key ingredient in a wine is matched with the name of a Tasmanian bird that the wine maker has sighted and photographed. Moreover, the name of the key ingredient and the name of the bird must be alliterative – this is essential!

Hence, Wattle Bird Walnut Leaf,  Firetail Fig and Banana  and Albatross Apricot and Date.

Some sample labels:

 

Outreach activity? Yes, invite friends to guess ingredients and suggest labels. A fun time. Enjoy!

Note: this outreach activity comes with health benefits 1 Timothy 5:23 and a health warning! – Proverbs 23: 29-35

PS  I can personally commend the wines 🙂

Rotunda of Witnesses #3

“Though millions of sacrifices had been offered, yet nothing was done to purchase redemption before Christ’s incarnation… so nothing was done after his resurrection to purchase redemption for men. Nor will there be anything more done to all eternity.”

– Johnathan Edwards (1703-1758) pastor, evangelist, writer and missionary

Quotes from Tapestry Bookmarks from The Billy Graham Center (Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA)

See, Rotunda of Witnesses #1  and  Rotunda of Witnesses #2

Brad Green: Team player

While I am very disappointed that Brad Green will not captain the ‘Mighty Demons’ (Melbourne AFL team) I am delighted that despite his personal disapointment he has a positive attitude to his role as a team player:

1. He will use the experience and skills he has to support the leadership. 

Green said everyone at Melbourne would need to shoulder some of the  leadership burden to help  Jack Trengove and Jack Grimes  deal with the  co-captaincy role.

“It’s going to be challenging for them. … so that is where this whole  football club has to embrace everyone becoming a leader and embracing these  guys, because they are going to need it,” Green said.

2. In whatever role we are placed we are to contribute positively to the team and its goals.

”I want to get out there and perform for these boys and help them win games  and  get back to playing finals.”

Great stuff from a true team player and leader.

Thanks Brad.

Read more: Green sad he’s not skipper, happy to be Demon

Rotunda of Witnesses #2

Blaise Pascal(1623-1662) is not known for being an Evangelist; he was an mathematician, physicist, engineer and inventor. But he was an apologist, spending time defending his faith in Jesus Christ.

“Not only do we know God through Jesus Christ, we only know ourselves through Jesus Christ.” – Blaise Pascal

 Quotes from Tapestry Bookmarks from The Billy Graham Center (Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA)

See, Rotunda of Witnesses #1

‘Church plea on Pontville’: Mercury

Church plea on Pontville by Helen Kempton, The Mercury, February 11, 2012

TASMANIA’S church leaders are lobbying Canberra to keep the Pontville detention centre, despite Immigration Minister Chris Bowen being firm in his commitment to close it as promised.

The Anglican Bishop of Tasmania spoke directly to Mr Bowen on Thursday to add his voice to the chorus of locals asking that the centre’s original six-month tenure be extended.

Mr Bowen has been inundated with correspondence from Tasmania this week, but said the state’s first asylum seeker detention centre would close by the end of the month, as first announced.

Bishop John Harrower said Mr Bowen’s response to him on the phone was in line with his recent public statements but the level of community support justified a change of policy.

Bishop Harrower said Mr Bowen had been wise to set a time limit when he first announced the plan to establish a detention centre just outside Hobart.

He said the time limit gave the Federal Government an out if the centre became an unwanted burden on the community.

But he said this had proved not to be the case.

“The minister should now be assured of the level of local community support. It is more than enough to justify amending his original commitment,” Bishop Harrower said yesterday.

“Those who hold him to the time limit must ask themselves whether they are motivated by principle or politics.”

The church said more than 45 local Anglicans were among the 300 or so people who have already signed petitions calling for the Pontville detention experiment to continue.

Bishop Harrower said he would prefer mandatory detention to play a minimal, or no role, in Australia’s asylum seeker processing policy.

“However, if we are to have detention centres, we should have centres like the one at Pontville where detainees have been able to interact with the local community,” he said.

See, Church plea on Pontville  and in a related Mercury article you can join me in voting ‘No’ to closing the Centre using the online poll.

*Also, please sign the PETITIONMinister for Immigration and Citizenship, Australia: Keep Pontville IDC Open

In all of this media activity please keep the well-being of the refugees in the centre of your heart and mind.

Examiner newspaper article, Pleas on detention centre rejected.

Keep Pontville Centre Open

Today I have been involved in media activity concerning the Pontville Refugee Detention Centre.

*ABC RADIO “AM”Anglican Bishop of Tasmania urges minister to keep detention centre open

*ULTRA106FIVE RADIO – Interview with David Wood.

*DIOCESAN MEDIA RELEASE: Friday 10th February 2012

BISHOP HARROWER CALLS FOR PONTVILLE CENTRE TO STAY OPEN

 The Anglican Bishop of Tasmania, the Right Reverend John Harrower OAM, has spoken out concerning the Immigration Detention Centre at Pontville and the plans for it to close in the near future.

Bishop Harrower said, “My view is that mandatory detention should play a minimal, if any, role in refugee policy. However, if we are to have detention centres we should have centres like the one at Pontville. At Pontville detainees have been able to interact with the local community. This has benefited both the detainees and the community.

“Yesterday I spoke with the Federal Minister for Immigration, The Hon. Chris Bowen, to add my voice to the many who are calling upon him to keep the Pontville centre open.

“At the time the centre was announced the Minister was wise to place a time limit in case the centre became an unwanted burden on the community.

“The Minister should now be assured of the level of local community support.

It is more than enough to justify amending his original commitment. Those who hold him to it must ask themselves whether they are motivated by principle or politics.

“The attitude in the Pontville and Brighton community is one of acceptance and welcome. I commend the work of the members of St. Mark’s Church, Pontville, and many others who have volunteered to help and be helped by the detainees.”

Over 45 local Anglicans are among those who have indicated support for a petition calling for the Pontville Centre to say open.

MEDIA RELEASE: BISHOP HARROWER CALLS FOR PONTVILLE CENTRE TO STAY OPEN

*SOUTHERN CROSS TV interview for this evening’s News  and

*EXAMINER Newspaper interview and 11 February article, Pleas on detention centre rejected.

*Please sign the PETITIONMinister for Immigration and Citizenship, Australia: Keep Pontville IDC Open

In all of this media activity please keep the well-being of the refugees in the centre of your heart and mind.

Orca rights are human rights. Right?

You’ve got to love it!

Do you agree that there is no fundamental difference between human beings and animals?

If you answer, “No difference.” then you will agree that just like humans, animals should not be treated as slaves. Therefore, liberate the whales from slavery. Let the orcas free!

No, it’s not an April 1st trick. It’s a court case in the USA:

A federal judge for the first time in US history heard arguments in a case that could determine whether animals enjoy the same constitutional protection against slavery as human beings.

“… a federal court heard arguments as to whether living, breathing, feeling beings have rights and can be enslaved simply because they happen to not have been born human. By any definition these orcas  have been enslaved here.”

Orca rights are human rights. Right?

No. Sorry, wrong!

On what grounds might we humans disagree?

Well, why aren’t the orcas’ judicial courts hearing the case or at least presenting it to a human court? – just a thought 😉

My argument: Jews and Christians believe human beings are different to animals and more highly valued than animals because human beings carry the very image of God. This belief is grounded in their sacred accounts of life’s beginnings in the Book of Genesis where humankind is God-breathed.

Hence, in the Judeo-Christian understanding of life, orcas do not have the same rights as humans. That’s why I like the newspaper’s sub title: “We’re talking about hell unleashed”. A quote,

If the court  were to grant orcas constitutional rights, Shaw warned the  ruling would  have profound implications that could impact everything from the  way the  U.S. government uses dogs to sniff out bombs and drugs to how zoos and   aquariums operate.

“We’re talking about hell unleashed,” he said.

But it is not just hell because animals have the rights of humans but, more strongly, that humans will have been reduced to animals.

It’s the old “nothing but” argument that reductionists use to state for example that a person is “nothing but” a composite of chemicals and therefore of only modest physical and financial value. Or that human beings are “nothing but” a randomn statistical piece of space junk hurtling mindlessly through space as it decays to oblivion .

I can only imagine that accepting orca rights as human rights would have interesting implications for Articles 1 and 3 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. (Article 1)

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. (Article 3)

Clearly, these Articles are based on the view that there is something very special about human beings. But why? That’s the million dollar question. Your answer?

Read more: ‘We’re talking about hell unleashed’: whales sue Sea World  and  In the Image of God: Human Rights-Religion.