Book Launch: ‘Sexegesis’

Today we launched Sexegesis – An Evangelical Response to Five Uneasy Pieces on Homosexuality at St David’s Cathedral, Hobart. I would like to express my thanks to the Revd Joel Kettleton and the Dean Richard Humphrey, for their work in putting together this event.

Here is the introduction which I gave at the book launch:

2012 marks the 50th Anniversary of the Anglican Church of Australia.  At the recent Synod of our Diocese we gave thanks that our founding documents affirm that we are part of the apostolic and worldwide church, that we are biblically based and that we are Christ centered.

As Anglicans then as we deal with issues such as homosexuality we do so in this context.

We are part of a worldwide Anglican communion and need to listen to that body which has clearly stated in the Lambeth Resolutions (1.10 – Human Sexuality) that homosexual practice is incompatible with the Scriptures.

As that resolution makes clear and the constitution of our Church says we take the Scriptures “as being the ultimate and standard of faith given by inspiration of God.”   The Church is not at liberty to “ordain anything contrary to God’s Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another.” (Article XX of the Anglican Church’s 39 Articles of Religion).  We need to keep coming back to Scripture, to wrestle with it, understand and apply it, even when it corrects and challenges us and our culture.

Last we do this focused on Christ which means that as this discussion continues it should be done with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience and showing the same kind of forgiving love that God has shown us in Christ.

I welcome ‘Sexegesis’ as part of this ongoing conversation which whilst strongly arguing for a traditional understanding of biblical sexual behavior as taking place within heterosexual marriage, it speaks this truth in love.

I encourage people to read this book and to continue through their own reading and thinking to come to a truly Biblical mind on this issue.  As we do so let us pray the Collect for 2nd Sunday in Advent (BCP),

Blessed Lord, who hast caused all Holy Scriptures to be written for our learning: Grant that we may in such wise hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them, that by patience and comfort of thy holy Word, we may embrace and ever hold fast the blessed hope of everlasting life, which thou hast given us in our Saviour Jesus Christ. Amen.

Here is the Dean, Richard Humphrey’s Book Launch statement:

Discussions regarding homosexuality and the Scriptures are always challenging, they challenge us in our prejudices, they challenge us in our thinking about authorities in life, they challenge us to think long and hard about what the Scriptures say and how this might apply to our lives, the task of exegesis and hermeneutics.

These challenges are all raised in Sexegesis and Five Uneasy Pieces, the book to which Sexegesis responds, as Christians seek to understand how to be faithful on this issue.

Sexegesis in defending the traditional Christian understanding of sexual behavior helps us in a number of ways.

Firstly I think it rightly challenges the notion that Christian thinking must change due to so called “scientific” and “psychological” discoveries in relation to homosexuality.  The jury is still very much out on issues such as a so called” gay gene.”  We also need to question whether any ethical decision can actually be solved with an appeal to “I was born this way”, which ultimately dissolves into “if it feels right do it.” That might be how our society thinks but it is clearly not how at least a Christian ethic can be constructed.

Secondly it helpfully reminds us that the biblical stance against homosexual practice is not based on proof texts from 5 debatable verses, but rather is developed from the Biblical Theology of sex, gender and marriage founded on Genesis 1-2 and developed by Jesus and Paul.  The lack of biblical theology in Five Uneasy Pieces is glaringly apparent and profoundly undermines its conclusions.  Sexegesis starts to do the hard work of exegesis of the 5 uneasy pieces, which we need to do, but always seeks to put this within the wider witness and theology of Scripture.

Thirdly there is a strong reminder of the need to listen and be pastorally sensitive as we deal with this topic.  Far too often a Christian stand on sexual ethics has been used to justify unchristian language and behavior towards the gay and lesbian community.  Any way in which Christian teaching has been used to promote hate of others is to be condemned.  To any who have experienced such hate from those who claim to speak as Christ’s followers we should ask for forgiveness.  We need to be clear on what Scripture teaches but be Christ like as we deal with people.

Lastly I believe as we think through this issue we need to remember that any discussion on homosexuality cannot be done from a moral high ground.  In Romans 1 Paul sees homosexuality as a result of a disordered society that has turned away from God, but he is not seeking to teach that in the passage.  Rather Paul is using a fairly standard Jewish diatribe against pagan practice to catch particularly his Jewish readers out in their own judgementalism.  As Paul says in Romans 2:1: “Therefore you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgement on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, are doing the very same things.”  Which leads to his more well known statement “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”.

Any discussion of homosexuality which does not push us all to fall back on God’s grace and his provision in Jesus Christ I believe will mean that have not truly understood God’s word to us.  That might be an uneasy truth for us all gay or straight, but ultimately is the way of hope for us all.

You can purchase this book here: Christian Education Publications

Global Aid Facts

I know it’s a month ago but I want to express my disappointment at the Federal Government’s breaking its promise to Australia’s aid and development assistance.

On 8 May, the Australian Government announced the 2012–13 Federal Budget. Despite a $315 million increase to the aid budget, the commitment to increase Official Development Assistance to 0.5% of Gross National Income by 2015–16 (currently 0.35%) was delayed by one year to 2016–17. This means $2.9 billion less for Australia’s aid program over the next four years which puts at risk 250,000 lives.

While a disappointing result, we should be encouraged that the aid budget was “significantly protected” (the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator the Hon. Bob Carr) as a result of the efforts of many people within the wider aid and development community.  The aid budget was finalised at the last minute, less than 24 hours before it went to the printers.

 For your information and interest are facts and figures regarding Australia’s Federal Aid Budget. Click here.

*Media Releases:

World Vision Australia Media Release

Minister for Foreign Affairs Media Release

Australian Council for International Development (ACFID) Media Release

*Budget documentation from the Australian Government

*My May 2 Letter to Prime Minister, Australians keep their word: rallying for aid.  Unfortunately the Federal Government did not keep its word.

C of E Ev Cncl: Marriage

Our Tasmanian Synod discussed marriage and I found the following article helpful. Excerpts from the full article: Church of England Evangelical Council publishes Statement on Marriage

The church’s conversation on the theology and ethics of same sex relationships continues unabated. Sometimes good thinking has been marred by insensitive and occasionally homophobic attitudes. Other times, genuinely compassionate and inclusive attitudes have been weakened by a lack of biblical rigour, and a consequent misreading of the revealed mind of God…

The Church of England Evangelical Council offers this irenic, finely argued, biblically articulate monograph, set as it is in the rich context of foundational Anglican thinking, to engage all in our church of whatever persuasion…

The following short statement seeks to help Anglicans understand our church’s teaching in the area of marriage and sexual relationships and its relevance today…

1 – God’s love and call to love

2 – God’s Word and Church

3 – God’s gift of marriage

4 – God’s grace and call to holiness,

5 – God’s people united in and by God’s word:
They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. (Acts 2:42) The visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful men, in which the pure word of God is preached and the sacraments be duly ministered according to Christ’s ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same. (Article XIX)
5a. The visible Church of Christ is a place where the life-giving and life-changing word of God is faithfully proclaimed.
5b. Redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships or affirming or blessing sexual activity outside marriage is contrary to God’s word.
5c. When a church does either of these things it therefore becomes difficult to recognise it as part of the visible Church of Christ. Consequently such matters fall outside the scope of acceptable ecumenical diversity and are a legitimate ground for division between churches.

Conclusion
Make every effort to live in peace with everyone and to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord. (Hebrews 12.14) We offer this five part statement to Anglican Christians in the hope that, guided and nourished by Scripture and tradition, we may be led together into the way of peace and holiness as we seek to bear faithful witness to the grace and truth of Christ in society and the wider church. We do so aware that as individuals and as a church we constantly fall short in our understanding and in our obedience. In this and every area of our discipleship and mission we must, therefore, be constant in prayer, seeking the grace of God

O God the strength of all them that put their trust in thee, mercifully accept our prayers; and because through the weakness of our mortal nature we can do no good thing without thee, grant us the help of thy grace, that in keeping thy commandments we may please thee both in will and deed; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. (Collect for the First Sunday after Trinity BCP)

Canada & NZ: ‘No’ to euthanasia

Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians published a statement opposing euthanasia and assisted suicide.

The chair of the New Zealand Medical Association stated that euthanasia is unethical and he further states,

If the NZMA condoned doctors taking a life, would we teach it at medical school? Would we have a course that teaches students to kill? And the ethical considerations do not stop there. Where should you put the line in the sand?

The NZMA code of ethics states:

“Doctors should bear in mind always the obligation of preserving life wherever possible and justifiable, while allowing death to occur with dignity and comfort. In such inevitable terminal situations, treatment applied with the primary aim of relieving patient distress is ethically acceptable, even when it may have the secondary effect of shortening life.”

Read more about this on Alex Schandenberg’s (Executive Officer and International Chair of Euthanasia Prevention Coalition) blog.

Rotunda of Witnesses #9

I end this ‘Rotunda of Witnesses’ series with great words of the Apostle Paul to the 1st century Christian community in Colossae (1:15-20):

“Jesus Christ is the image of the unseen God and the first born of all creation. For in Him were created all things in heaven and on earth; everything visible and invisible, thrones, dominations, sovereignities, powers – all things were created through Him and for Him. Before anything was created He existed, and He holds all things in unity.”

Quotes from Tapestry Bookmarks from The Billy Graham Center(Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA)

See, Rotunda of Witnesses #1

Rotunda of Witnesses #8

Justin Martyr (100-164 AD) was an early church father who was killed for his faith in and proclamation of Christ, among many other Christians in Rome.

“No one trusted in Socrates so as to die for his doctrine, but in Christ, not only philosophers and scholars believed, but also artisans, and people entirely uneducated, despising glory and fear and death.”

 See also, Rotunda of Witnesses #7.

Quotes from Tapestry Bookmarks from The Billy Graham Center (Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA)

“Does Religion Poison Everything?” Part 2

From the Chaplain: Does Religion Poison Everything? (Part 2)

In response to The New Atheists’ assertion that religion poisons everything I asked that we consider four questions:

  1. should we treat all faiths and people of faith the same?
  2. has Christianity spawned violence?
  3. has Christianity done any good?
  4. is religious faith good or bad for you?

Last week we considered the first two of these questions, Part 1. This week I will briefly discuss questions three and four.

3. Has Christianity done any good? Christianity has clearly been one of the world’s greatest forces for good. Imagine our city without City Mission, Anglicare, the Salvos, St Vinnie’s; and without St. Johns, St Helens and Calvary hospitals; and without The Hutchins, The Friends, St Marys, Guilford Young, numerous Catholic primary schools and St Michael’s Collegiate School. When I was in the Solomon Islands last year I visited the only Crises Centre for women and children escaping domestic violence – a centre started by and run by the Sisters of the Church. I could go on to to talk about the work of World Vision, The Leprosy Mission, the establishment of Universities, the abolition of slavery, the end of cannibalism, etc. etc.

4. Is religious faith good or bad for you? The evidence that religion is actually good for you is becoming increasingly overwhelming. Professor Andrew Sims, former President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, has written, “The advantageous effect of religious belief and spirituality on mental and physical health is one of the best-kept secrets in psychiatry and medicine generally.” Amongst other things Sims writes that religious involvement is consistently correlated in scientific studies with well-being, happiness and life satisfaction; hope and optimism; purpose and meaning in life; higher self-esteem; lower rates of depression and faster recovery from depression; lower rates of suicide; less anxiety, lower rates of alcohol and drug use and abuse; less delinquency and criminal activity; greater marital stability and satisfaction, etc. etc.

Religion clearly doesn’t poison everything.

Shalom (Peace),  Scott Sargent, School Chaplain, St Michael’s Collegiate School Hobart

‘Lost in Translation’ update

This month, the Assemblies of God (AOG) USA and the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA) study committees have released their reports on the use of Father and Son in translation.

The Assemblies of God World Missions’ April 2012 document was made public on May 15, 2012, and entitled, “The Necessity for Retaining Father and Son Terminology in Scripture Translations for Muslims.” Its summary statement read:

“Our Fellowship is unrelentingly committed to the authority and infallibility of Scripture. While we appreciate the challenges missionaries and translators face in intercultural communication, we will neither compromise nor dilute God’s eternal truth, nor change its intended plain meaning. We, therefore, urge all believers to reject these and any other Scripture translations, whether for Muslim or non-Muslim audiences, for both public and personal use, that do not literally translate Father and Son terminology.”   (Pages 16-17)

In a similar fashion the PCA study committee released their findings on May 18 under the title “Like Father, Like Son: Divine Familial Language in Bible Translation.

“Bible translations geared for Islamic contexts should not be driven by concerns that Muslims may recoil from biological terms applied to God or Jesus. That revulsion originates primarily out of religious conviction, not any communicative limitation of the terms themselves. The essentially biological terms (Hebrew, ben and ab; Greek, huios and pater) are divinely given and therefore should be translated into comparable biological terms. Footnotes, parentheticals and other paratextual comments may be used to explain the biblical and theological riches of Scripture, while never subverting the important truths embedded in the biological contours of Scripture’s words…The responsibility for faithful translation and worldwide gospel proclamation rests finally in the church of Jesus Christ.”

See also: Keep “Father” & “Son” in the Bible!”