This intriguing statement was made during an energized exchange seeking to identify parish outreach strategies. The passion of the speaker quoted was to focus evangelism and mission on the group of people who were perceived to be within the parish\u2019s reach. The comment drew reaction from those who believed there were plenty of non middle class Anglicans in Tasmania and beyond.<\/p>\n
The \u2018Anglicans are middle class\u2019 statement identified us as a particular people grouping. The consequence was to unapologetically \u2018focus on the values and interests of this group of people in our community as we drew up the parish\u2019s mission action plan.<\/p>\n
The idea of identifying who we are and who the wider community is, when seeking to plan our mission, is strategic thinking.<\/p>\n
Interestingly, in the 1970s (yes, pre-history!), the missiological literature was encouraging mission to focus on particular people groups with their common values and cultures. The basic argument is that it is easier for us to communicate the Gospel with people who share common culture and this is how people are comfortable together and it simply makes sense to reach out to people in this focused way. This is called the homogenous unit principle and was developed by Donald McGavran. The international Lausanne Committee held The Pasadena Consultation – Homogeneous Unit Principle<\/a> and I recall it being compulsory reading for a budding missionary! More recently,<\/p>\n In The Bridges of God<\/em> (McGavran) states: \u2018People become Christian fastest when least change of race or clan is involved\u2019. In Understanding Church Growth<\/em> (1970, 3rd Ed. 1990), which (McGavran) co-wrote with C. Peter Wagner, this observation has become the \u2018Homogeneous Unit Principle\u2019. Empirical evidence, they argue,\u00a0 \u2018people like to become Christians without crossing racial, linguistic or class barriers\u2019. As a result homogenous churches grow fastest. Homogeneous churches are those in which all the members are from a similar social, ethnic or cultural background. People prefer to associate with people like themselves \u2013 \u2018I like people like me\u2019. And so we should create homogenous churches to be effective in reaching people.<\/p>\n The main criticism of the homogenous unit principle is that it denies the reconciling nature of the gospel and the church. It weakens the demands of Christian discipleship and it leaves the church vulnerable to partiality in ethnic or social conflict.<\/p>\n Yet most churches are homogenous to some extent. People choose churches on the basis of worship-style, denominational allegiance, theological emphasis and even cultural background. As soon as you choose to operate in one language you have created an homogenous group.<\/p>\n The result of this in the UK<\/strong> has been to leave significant sectors of the population untouched by the gospel. British evangelicalism is largely middle-class<\/strong>. Our evangelism revolves around our friendships so excluding those outside our circle of acquaintance. More significantly still, our church life and evangelism reflect a middle-class culture<\/strong>. Homogeneous groups do seem to be effective in evangelism, but they are by definition exclusive rather than inclusive.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n (emphasis mine)<\/p>\n Fascinating stuff! Is Tasmania the UK? Read on! See the excellent full article<\/a> (from which the above quote comes) on this still current missiological issue by Tim Chester.<\/p>\n Does the homogeneous unit principle have some application in your context?<\/p>\n Is your Mission Action Plan sensitive to your cultural context?<\/p>\n If it is true to say that \u2018Anglicans are . . . class\u2019 in your context,<\/p>\n This intriguing statement was made during an energized exchange seeking to identify parish outreach strategies. The passion of the speaker quoted was to focus evangelism and mission on the group of people who were perceived to be within the parish\u2019s … Continue reading For conversation:<\/h3>\n
\n